In the case of:
Ambika Stores Vs. Deputy State Tax Officer
W.P. No. 6320 of 2024
[2024] 160taxmann.com433 (Madras)
It was observed by Hon’ble High Court of Madras that:
- On examining the show cause notice, it is evident that two tables are set out therein. In the first table, the CGST and SGST amounts in GSTR-3B are shown as Rs. 3,33,787/-, whereas in the second table dealing with the difference between the GSTR-3B return and the auto populated GSTR-2A return, the GSTR-3B amounts are specified as Rs. 5,19,362/- both for CGST and SGST. The sum of Rs. 5,19,362/- tallies with the ITC availed of by the petitioner.
- Thus, the show cause notice is contradictory.
- In addition, it appears that the reply of the petitioner was not considered in the assessment order.
- The order simply states “It has been noticed that you have filed both GSTR 1 and GSTR-3B for the period from July – 2017 to March – 2018 thereby collecting the tax. During the scrutiny of the return for the above tax period difference between liability declared in GSTR-1 and tax paid under GSTR-3B as detailed below which shows that there was a mismatch between GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B returns.”
- The above order indicates clearly that the assessing officer did not take into account the reply dated 29.09.2023 and record reasons as to why such reply is not satisfactory.
- Therefore, the impugned assessment order is quashed and department can issue a fresh SCN.